Explore and engage with other people's views
through words, pictures or video.
Discussion Question: On March 18, 2005, Amina Wadud led the first female-led Jumu`ah Prayer. On that day, women took a huge step towards being more like men. But, did we come closer to actualizing our God-given liberation?
The following is an answer to this question posted on Islam Online in 2005.
****
Well, answering your question, I can say that I don't think so.
What we so often forget is that God has honored women by giving them value in relation to God—not in relation to men. But as Western feminism erases God from the scene, there is no standard left but men. As a result, the Western feminist is forced to find her value in relation to a man. And in so doing, she has accepted a faulty assumption. She has accepted that man is the standard, and thus a woman can never be a full human being until she becomes just like a man—the standard.
When a man cut his hair short, she wanted to cut her hair short. When a man joined the army, she wanted to join the army, and so on. She wanted these things for no other reason than because the "standard" had it.
What she didn't recognize was that God dignifies both men and women in their distinctiveness, not their sameness. And on March 18, Muslim women made the very same mistake.
For 1,400 years, there has been a consensus of scholars that men are to lead Prayer. As a Muslim woman, why does this matter? The one who leads Prayer is not spiritually superior in any way. Something is not better just because a man does it. And leading Prayer is not better just because it is leading. Had it been the role of women or had it been more divine, why wouldn't the Prophet have asked Lady `A'ishah or Lady Khadijah, or Lady Fatimah—the greatest women of all time—to lead? These women were promised heaven and yet they never led Prayer.
But now, for the first time in 1,400 years, we look at a man leading Prayer and we think, "That's not fair." We think so, although God has given no special privilege to the one who leads. The imam is no higher in the eyes of God than the one who prays behind. On the other hand, only a woman can be a mother. And the Creator has given special privilege to a mother. The Prophet taught us that heaven lies at the feet of mothers. But no matter what a man does, he can never be a mother. So why is that not unfair?
When asked who is most deserving of our kind treatment? The Prophet replied "your mother" three times before saying "your father" only once. Isn't that sexist? No matter what a man does, he will never be able to have the status of a mother.
And yet even when God honors us with something uniquely feminine, we are too busy trying to find our worth in reference to men, to value it or even notice it. We too have accepted men as the standard; so anything uniquely feminine is, by definition, inferior. Being sensitive is an insult, becoming a mother is a degradation. In the battle between stoic rationality (considered masculine) and selfless compassion (considered feminine), rationality reigns supreme.
As soon as we accept that everything a man has and does is better, all that follows is just a knee jerk reaction: if men have it, we want it too. If men pray in the front rows, we assume this is better, so we want to pray in the front rows too. If men lead Prayer, we assume the imam is closer to God, so we want to lead Prayer too. Somewhere along the line, we've accepted the notion that having a position of worldly leadership is some indication of one's position with God.
A Muslim woman does not need to degrade herself in this way. She has God as a standard. She has God to give her value; she doesn't need a man here.
In fact, in our crusade to follow men, we, as women, never even stopped to examine the possibility that what we have is better for us. In some cases, we even gave up what was higher only to be like men...It took women in the West almost a century of experimentation to realize a privilege given to Muslim women 1,400 years ago. Given my privilege as a woman, I only degrade myself by trying to be something I'm not, and in all honesty, don't want to be—a man. As women, we will never reach true liberation until we stop trying to mimic men and value the beauty in our own God given distinctiveness.
If given a choice between stoic justice and compassion, I choose compassion. And if given a choice between worldly leadership and heaven at my feet, I choose heaven.
I think there maybe some confusion over the role of the imam as a person leading a prayer and the role as an imam as the head of state. An imam as a head of state has essentially become a shia concept with the sunni’s having a caliphate. This issue of leadership is also contentious. Both parties having credible points of view, but I essentially think it is down to women to make that choice themselves. Though bearing in mind many more women would prefer to stay at home than go to work according to opinion polls (as cited from Vanessa Feltz show). I know my last sentence is relating to women working but the principle is the effect it may have on the woman herself when her role as a mother is compounded by her time to work. Working mothers do not have it easy and children do suffer for the reduced maternal relationship. I am not against women working as it is a woman’s choice however a mothers and father’s main priority should be whats best for the children. Also I do feel that it is very difficult in today’s day and age for both parents not to work. Life is becoming more expensive and we needing a dual income household, though I can’t help feeling there being social consequences. Bear in mind in the Muslim world it has seen female heads of state in Turkey, Bangladesh, Indonesia and Pakistan elected in a democratic process. So any stereotypes hold little merit. I also think Muslim female spokepersons and scholars are increasing they having more influence then local imams as the younger generation identify less with their imams and more so with rigorous scholarship. Unfortunately, most imams lack in scholarship beyond knowing the ritualistic manner of leading the prayer. The restriction from women in religious leadership is an ambiguous statement to me, because Muslim women have founded universities, the worlds oldest being the University of Al-Karaouine founded by a Fatima al-Fihri…but as far as I am aware she didn’t lead a prayer though was very influential, the same can be said for the Prophet’s wives who were highly influential in policy making and on religious jurisprudence even over riding the opinions of male scholars…Islamic history especially law…is filled with these scenarios… As long as there is freedom to education muslim women will have the space and opportunity to be pioneers.
Two questions on this interesting and thought-provoking article: 1) Do women have to choose between “worldly leadership†and “heaven at their feet� What about the many strong women in leadership of all religious backgrounds who also nurture children? 2) Imams may have no more influence in the eyes of God than anyone else, but in the eyes of society their voices are more influential. By keeping women from this role do we limit the positive influence that women can have in leadership? In other words, Is the restriction from women in religious leadership from God or from men? This second question is also challenging Christians in many churches, with different answers. What’s yours?