This is what happens most often at educational-type events. A speaker talks to the audience, and afterwards answers questions and maybe engages in a little more free discussion.
Allow about an hour for the talk . That’s usually the maximum that people can take without losing concentration; unless the speaker is unusually skillful and uses a variety of media, visual aids, and techniques.
For example:
- Introduction from chairperson or host (5 minutes maximum, usually less)
- Speech (45 minutes)
- Questions (15 minutes)
You may want to allow more time for questions but some people will be losing concentration.
Pros:
- Simple and doesn’t take much imagination to organise or facilitate
- Gets quality information from a high-value speaker
- Allows for depth – suits a complex and important topic
- Allows some interaction for attendees
- Gives contact and exposure to interesting figures and ideas so they can be explored
- A popular format – people know what to expect and don’t feel exposed or embarrassed
Cons:
- It can be long for some people’s attention span; deadly with a dull speaker
- Some people don’t learn best this way
- Where there is controversy, usually this highlights only one point of view; no balance
- Restricts audience participation – the people asking questions will be the most extravert, not necessarily the best
- Can easily be disrupted or hijacked by people who want to create trouble; or even well-meaning people in the audience who keep the microphone and give their own little speech, annoying everyone.
- Speaker’s costs will need to be covered
Campusalam is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
A Campusalam Facebook site now exists to share views and keep up with debate. Visit Facebook.com and search for "Campusalam"
If you would like to be one of the first to run a Campusalam event. We have interesting speakers who can help make the event a success. contact us.